On August 19, the Special Representative of the President of the Russian Federation for the Middle East and African Countries, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia Mikhail Bogdanov received the representative of the leadership of the Syrian opposition Front for Change and Liberation, the head of Moscow Platform of the Syrian opposition, Kadri Jamil, at his request.
The comic scene in which Washington found itself in the UN Security Council days ago, with one ally, the Dominican Republic, which is “microscopic” in size and weight, facing all other countries, represents a prototype of complete series of plays that we will witness through the coming months and years; Such is the case for historically crumbling empires, which, in their last days, turn into an ideal model of cynicism.
Dr. Kadri Jamil – Secretary of the People’s Will Party, member of the presidency of the Front for Change and Liberation, and head of the Moscow Platform for the Syrian Opposition – held a press conference on Tuesday, 8 August 2020, hosted by the Russia news agency Segodnya, in Moscow.
The Syrian opposition’s Front for Change and Liberation condemns the «agreement» announced today between the United Arab Emirates and the Zionist entity under American patronage.
Whether the Beirut tragedy was an accidental explosion or a planned bombing, the following is obvious:
Multiple parties intersect at their wish that the third round of the Syrian Constitutional Committee, which will start on the 24th of this month, would not reach any result, as happened in the past two rounds, and similarly to the many meetings held in Geneva during the past years.
The recent elections of People's Assembly reconfirmed what was already confirmed: the existing electoral system is a system that kills the political movement, incapable of representing society, and is a game in the hands of the financial forces and the forces of the state apparatus.
“The world is in turmoil. Economies are in freefall… and the virus has exposed the fragility of our world”.
The debate has been getting more heated recently about the different perceptions for the new Syria. What this means with regards to the nature of the political system in Syria, and by implication the nature of the relationship among the three branches of government, as well as the question of the relationship between centralization and decentralization.
