There is a sharp polarization in the entire world these days about what is happening in Ukraine. This is natural and expected, due to the definite effects of the event - and whatever its final results will be - on the overall global development.

The repercussions of the government resolution to lift subsidies for specific strata of the Syrian people had not yet been stabilized, while indications began to increase about the whole process being nothing more than a first step towards completely lifting governmental subsidies. It happened very quickly in way that threatens the life of millions of Syrians with further deterioration and bad conditions.

The Ukrainian subject continues to occupy the leading position on the world stage for the second week in a row. Although this will remain so for quite some time, even if the military operations phase ends soon, the nature of the ongoing battle, as well as the major features of the post-Ukraine world, have already begun to become clear:

The tense situation these days in and around Ukraine is the most prominent headline around the world. This is not surprising, because everyone is aware, to some degree, that the contents and dimensions of the ongoing battle go far beyond Ukraine itself. The results of the battle even go as far as separating two historical eras.

We continue what we started in Kassioun issues 1053 and 1055 editorials, which had the same main title and the following two subtitles, respectively:  Part 1: Two Mentalities, and Part 2: Ruling Forces in the Regime and Opposition.

Over the last few days and under the slogan of “redistributing subsidies to those who deserve it”, more than half a million Syrian families, that is nearly 3 million Syrians, were decategorized as “deserving subsidies”. This was directly reflected in raising the price of a bundle of bread for these people to 1300 Syrian pounds; meaning that the cost of bread alone, if a family of five consumes two bundles per day, will reach 78000 Syrian pounds per month. That means bread alone now consumes almost the entire average salary.

As a continuation of Kassioun’s editorial 1053 about interpreting 2254 between two mentalities, which was the first part in a series of interconnected editorials, we discuss in this second part, the interpretation of the resolution between two local mindsets: the mindset of the ruling forces in the regime and that of the ruling forces in the opposition. These two mindsets ultimately deal with the resolution and the entire Syrian situation using the same logic, though from two opposite angles. Perhaps the first and most important point of overlap between the two is the “leading party” mindset that dominates the thinking and action on both sides. This is founded on exclusion, exclusivity, and claim of comprehensive and complete representation.

These days, the entire world is sleeping and waking up to the beat of the war drums in Ukraine. In addition to the wave of the West’s official statements, including about the rapid evacuation of Western diplomats from Kiev, the Western media is talking about how the world is days and perhaps hours away from the outbreak of war.

The clash between two distinct international mentalities continues in interpreting UNSC Resolution 2254, six years after the UN Security Council unanimously adopted it in December 2015.

By the end of 2021, the average cost of living for a Syrian family has reached more than 2 million Syrian pounds. This increases the huge gap between these costs and the minimum wage of the Syrian worker, which "increased" according to the last decree to reach 92,970 Syrian pounds; inadequate to meet the monthly food cost of the worker himself!