Skip to main content

Articles (322)

Commenting on an article in Kassioun’s last issue, a friend asked me: “You link US withdrawal from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Middle East in general, to the US’ effort to concentrate forces in confronting China. But aren't these areas, from which withdrawals are taking place, including Syria, part of the countries through which the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative, the largest Chinese initiative and project, passes? Wouldn’t the withdrawal of the US from these areas make it easier for China to complete its project and thus complete its economic and political supremacy?”

 

Since the Chinese Foreign Minister’s visit to Syria on the 17th of this month until this moment, the torrent of bizarre “political analyses” has not stopped, punctuated by a lot of innuendos, insinuations, and clever allusions, most of which add to a set of basic matters, which can be summarized as follows:

 

Perhaps one of the most important news of the past week regarding the Eastern Mediterranean, is what the Wall Street Journal reported from US officials about “a US-Iraqi agreement on the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq at the end of this year”, on the 22nd of this month. This was in the context of meetings of an Iraqi delegation headed by the Iraqi Minister of Foreign Affairs with its US counterpart. The meetings will be wrapped on Monday, the 26th of this month.

 

The Syrian economic situation is controlled by politics with all its details and daily events, and it is shackled with high obstaces that can not be surpassed through half solutions but only through a comprehensive political settlement which reconstitutes the country, brings its parts together, and ends the dispersal of its people. All politically and economically active powers in the Syrian situation are clearly aware of this fact, whether those who want to invest in the reconstruction of Syria and its future or those who invest in its destruction today! Those powers of “investment’ are waiting until the nature and potential of upcoming partnerships - according to their perspective - appear. At this current phase, none of them is seriously seeking to take any step except to the extent that prevents a complete collapse and allows remaining at the edge of the abyss.

Energy and Bread; there is perhaps nothing that intensifies the material and economic essentials of any social structure more than these two components. Bread is enough for survival, and energy is necessary for moving forward and for work. The abundance of these two components is the necessary and inadequate limit to guarantee economic, political, and social security. When the economic and political structure is “lenient” with bread and energy crises, then it is practically not looking for the essentials for survival or moving forward, and is indifferent about falling into the abyss.   

الإثنين, 19 تموز/يوليو 2021 18:12

Withdrawal from Hell and What Follows!

It was not in vain that US Army General Andersen called Afghanistan “hell” in 2014 when commenting on the predicament of the US army there.

الإثنين, 19 تموز/يوليو 2021 12:36

US Withdrawal from Syria: When and How?

If we put aside the different classifications and look at one issue: where are American troops located within the countries of the region called the “Middle East”, then we will see that American troops are present in almost all of those countries. This presence is in fixed NATO bases; within operations of “alliances”, “trainings”, or something along those lines; or in a direct hostile manner.

الثلاثاء, 13 تموز/يوليو 2021 19:20

Which Type of Violence is the Most Dangerous in Syria Today?

Although ten years have passed, “violence” in its various forms is still the most prominent headline in describing what is happening against the Syrian people, though that violence has taken different forms during the past ten years, and it has been practiced by many sides. Violence has become one of the most important tools used and still being used by the various forces and sides to suppress the Syrian people and try to divide Syria geographically and humanly, and to reinforce and deepen that division with the aim of perpetuating and fixing it and thus deepening the crisis and striving to make it impossible to reach a comprehensive and implementable political solution.

As the forces, sides, and circumstances at all levels changed, the forms of violence also changed to ensure the ability of stakeholders to achieve their objectives and interests that contradict and go against the interests of the Syrian people.

In many past articles we have discussed the saying the People’s Will Party has adopted since nearly 2005 (at the time the party was the National Committee for the Unity of the Syrian Communists), that about illusory dualisms. Some of the clearer examples of that are: opponent v. loyalist, secular v. religious, in addition to sectarian, national, and other dualities.

On Friday, July 9, 2021, the UN Security Council adopted unanimously a resolution, UNSC Resolution 2585, on the delivery of humanitarian aid into Syria through border crossings and “to all parts of Syria without discrimination”.

الصفحة 12 من 23