“The American Green Light” and Measuring an Electron Using the “Cubit”!

No one will argue how absurd it is to use primitive measurement units to this extent in an age when the accuracy of measurement has reached calculating the electron radius, which is approximately 2.8 femtometers, i.e., 28 after 14 zeros following the decimal point.
Nevertheless, when the discussion is about politics, and within the framework of what is called “political analysis”, one will not fail to have “pounds” and “heaps” of analysts who measure the present using ancient standards.
Since we are in the femto- (and less) accuracy era, even measuring the past and present in years has become completely inaccurate without even adding other factors, the most important of which is the acceleration of the accumulation of human knowledge.
To be clearer, those who study cognitive development of humanity say that humanity has accumulated knowledge during the ten years between 1990 and 1999 as much as it had accumulated throughout its history until 1990, and that the speed of knowledge accumulation is steadily increasing. In other words, humanity produced in the 9 years after 1999 as much as it had produced between 1990 and 1999, and then in 8 years, and so on.
If we look from our temporal position today at the end of 2020 to the year 1991, what separates us from it is not only 29 years, but it seems almost the year 1991 a distant past, if we take into account the amount of knowledge accumulated from then to today.

The Green Light

Why 1991? Because it is the year of the collapse of the Soviet Union and the domination of the US over the world as one pole, where nothing on the planet goes without a “green light” from it.
With this backward measuring tool, and with the denial of everything that has changed over the past three decades, on top of which is the grueling crisis and chronic regression that Washington and the West are experiencing in general, “political analysts” continue to measure the present, and even come out with conclusions and plans.
Regarding the Syrian issue, analysts from the two extremist sides continue to use this stone knife called the American green light to cut the ropes of reality and classify them. But are they really backward to this dismal extent?
In reality, we cannot deny that a large portion of them is really this way, but it is also certain that the directives coming from the actual controllers of these “analyses” and the platforms that launch them, ultimately determine the purposes of using these analyses.
In essence, the issue in our opinion is based on the following simple fact: the extremists and big corruptors within the regime and the opposition alike, practically and spiritually belong to the Western system through which they enjoy positions of plundering their people, to fill their own pockets and the pockets of their Western masters. The decline of this system and its collapse will leave them orphans in the face of people’s anger that has accumulated over many decades.
This in the general sense, but also in the direct and specific sense, means the attribution of superman capabilities to Washington is targeted in tangible terms, and as we see from the analyses revealed by the extremists on both sides, the following:
1- Misleading Syrians about the reality of what is happening, and when you are misled about the truth, you will not have an actual measure to sort out the behavior and statements of the forces, which are in your interest and which are against you.
2- The search for any pretext to suggest that Moscow is in agreement with Washington behind the Iranians and the Turks, and the purpose of this is very clear, which is targeting the Astana track and trying to create discord among its parties.
3- Creating an imaginary additional weight for Washington and its camp in Syria perchance this will balance the weight of the Astana track in order to maintain a zero or near-zero equation whose function is to maintain the status quo, because the current conditions are “stability” not only from Jeffrey’s point of view, but also from the point of view of the Syrian extremists.
4- Making equal the behavior of the Russians and the Americans by assuming that what the Russians are doing is only at the behest of the Americans or with a “green light” from them, especially with regard to the issue of the occupied Syrian Golan and the Palestinian cause, to sow despair among Syrians and to prepare them for “options” that preserve “stability”, as the only possible options.
In conclusion, if we accept, for the sake of argument, that there is indeed a so-called “American green light”, then a serious question poses itself, and it is a question that those who use the “American green light” might be able to give us an answer to: Have you examined the light well? Are you sure that it does not include the phrase “made in China”?